What was the supreme court ruling on gay marriage

But again, the point that I make in the book is that we have to tune those things out. Hodges: Under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, all states must license a marriage between two people of the same sex and recognize such a marriage if it was lawfully licensed and performed in another state.

Breaking News. Justice Amy Coney Barrett was pressed in an interview with CBS News on concerns that the Supreme Court may overturn its landmark Obergefell same-sex marriage ruling fromresponding by saying critics "say a lot of different things.

Obergefell v. O'Donnell pointed to a passage in Barrett's new book in which she wrote that the Court has held "the rights to marry, engage in sexual intimacy, use birth control and raise children are fundamental," unlike rights to do business, suicide or obtain an abortion.

Hodges decision when she defied a U. The Supreme Court could make a decision about whether to accept Davis' case in the coming months but has not indicated either way which way it is leaning. The Supreme Court has been asked to revisit the Obergefell decision by Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who garnered national attention by declining to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the decision.

Obergefell v. Hodges, U.S. () (/ ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl / OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.

Davis made national headlines just two months after the Obergefell v. Opinion My Turn All Opinion. Legal experts previously told Newsweekhowever, they do not believe that case will lead to the overturning of same-sex marriage rights.

Barrett responded to the concern, saying, "I think people who criticize the court, or who are outside the court, say a lot of different things.

What to know about

ET: This article was updated with additional information. Hodges, U.S. (), is the Supreme Court decision issued on June 26,that in a 5–4 ruling held state bans on same-sex marriage and state refusals to recognize marriages lawfully performed elsewhere unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett was pressed in an interview with CBS News on concerns that the Supreme Court may overturn its landmark Obergefell same-sex marriage ruling fromresponding by saying. Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek her comment indicates she may not be inclined to overturn same-sex marriage rights.

Barrett said in the CBS News interview: "What the court is trying to do is see what the American people have decided, and sometimes the American people have expressed themselves in the Constitution itself, which is our fundamental law, sometimes in statutes, but the court should not be imposing its own values on the American people.

Rossi told Newsweek her latest comments indicate that she is "not inclined to overturn the right to same-sex marriage. Recommended For You. Related Podcasts.

What to know about

A landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling 10 years ago on June 26,legalized same-sex marriage across the U.S. Obergefell v. Barrett is viewed as a key swing vote on the bench. Although she is a conservative justice appointed by President Donald Trumpshe is viewed as a key swing vote on the High Court, as she has been willing to break from the other conservatives on some issues in the past.

Jackson Women's Health Organization : "In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Hodgeswhich guaranteed the right for same-sex couples to marry nationwide.

By Andrew Stanton and Jason Lemon. Some justices like Clarence Thomas have signaled an openness to revisiting the case Obergefell v. The 5–4 ruling requires all 50 states, the District of. Sign In. My Turn All Opinion.

I want Americans to understand the law, and it's not just an opinion poll about whether the Supreme Court thinks something is good or whether the Supreme Court thinks something is bad," she said. O'Donnell continued the line of questioning, pointing to a passage in her book where she described "rights to marry" as "fundamental.